12/17/2023 0 Comments Git squash mergeThis is useful for cherry-picking commits to other branches or repositories. What is squash merge A squash merge is a merge option in Git that will produce a merge commit with only one parent. Squash and merge is OK for smaller changes, but it might be smarter to break large feature branches into multiple logical commits. Interactive rebase has a bit of a steeper learning curve, but with practice, it can work in all scenarios. In addition, rebase is the most flexible workflow – larger and more difficult merges can be tough to do with a squash and merge. Rebase retains a linear commit history, which is important for rollbacks. Squash + Merge acts like merge but creates a single new squashed commit that encompasses all commits in the feature branch. With the fast-forward-only flag ff-only, git will attempt to merge without a merge commit, but this isn't possible if the branches have diverged (i.e., there has been a commit to the parent branch that's not on the feature branch). Merge with the squash option: git merge squash. We’ll address two different approaches to squashing commits: Interactive rebase: git rebase -i. That is, git squash is an invalid Git command. Merge will create a merge commit that joins two branches together. We should note that squash is not a Git command, even if it’s a common Git operation. You may also have to force push changes (since you are rewriting history) if you have already pushed to a remote. This provides a linear history, meaning context is lost of where a feature branched off. Rebase rewrites history on top of a branch. Each has its quirks, so which one should you use? When version controlling your code with git, there are generally three choices when merging feature branches into main.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |